Terminalia chebula (fruit)

From AHPA Botanical Identity References Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search

AHPA recognizes other valuable resources exist regarding the identity of Terminalia chebula.

To submit a suggestion or contribution, please contact Merle Zimmermann.

Contents

Nomenclature

Terminalia chebula Retz.   Combretaceae  
Standardized common name (English): chebulic myrobalan  
Ayurvedic name(s): haritaki  
Pinyin name(s): he zi (fruit)

Botanical Voucher Specimen

bottomright

Terminalia chebula Tropicos 100176418 (S).jpg
Source: MOBOT, Tropicos.org[1]

Organoleptic Characteristics

[Terminalia chebula (fruit) is]] inodorous [...] with a bitterish, astringent taste.

Source: United States Dispensatory (1918) [2]

Macroscopic Characteristics

The fruit is roundish or ovate, varying in size from that of a hazel nut to that of a walnut. It consists of an exterior firm fleshy portion and an interior kernel which is light brown.

[It is] irregularly ovoid or fusiform, from ten to thirty millimetres or more long and from five to fifteen millimetres wide; strongly shrivelled longitudinally, dark brown or nearly black; in transverse section dark, with a small central cavity; hard.

When the fruit is entire, it is blackish, spherical depressed, of the size of a cherry, presenting six obtuse ribs with as many deep furrows, and separating into six valves, and has a strongly astringent and acidulous taste. It is often in segments, as found in commerce.

Source: United States Dispensatory (1918) [3]

Microscopic Characteristics

High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Identification

HPTLC-assoc-Logo-farbig-Text-schwarz-300x47.png
(thumbnail)
Chebulic myrobalan fruit, he zi (fruit) HPTLC ID - UV 254 nm

Chebulic myrobalan fruit, he zi (fruit) (Terminalia chebula)

Lane Assignments Lanes, from left to right (Track, Volume, Sample):

  1. 5 µL Chebulinic acid, ellagic acid, and gallic acid (increasing Rf)
  2. 1 µL Belleric myrobalan fruit
  3. 1 µL Chebulic myrobalan fruit
  4. 1 µL Amla fruit
  5. 1 µL Triphala powder 

Reference Sample(s) Reference: Dissolve 1 mg of chebulinic acid and 2 mg gallic acid in 10 mL of methanol. Optional: dissolve 1 mg of ellagic acid in 10 mL of methanol. 

Stationary Phase Stationary phase, i.e. Silica gel 60, F254 

Mobile Phase Ethyl formate, toluene, formic acid, water 30:1.5:4:3 (v/v/v/v) 

Sample Preparation Method Sample: Mix 1.0 g of powdered sample with 10 mL of methanol and sonicate for 10 minutes, then centrifuge or filter and use the supernatants/filtrates as test solutions.

Derivatization reagent: 1.) NP reagent, Preparation: 1 g of natural products reagent in 200 mL of ethyl acetate; 2.) PEG reagent, Preparation: 10 g of polyethylene glycol 400 in 200 mL of dichloromethane, Use: Heat plate for 3 min at 100°C, dip (time 0, speed 5) in NP reagent, dry, dip (time 0, speed 5) in PEG reagent 

Detection Method Saturated chamber; developing distance 70 mm from lower edge; relative humidity 33% 

Other Notes Images presented in this entry are examples and are not intended to be used as basis for setting specifications for quality control purposes.

System suitability test: Chebulinic acid: a quenching zone at Rf ~ 0.26 (UV 245 nm). Gallic acid: a quenching zone at Rf ~ 0.71(UV 245 nm).

Identification: Compare result with reference images. The fingerprint of the test solution is similar to that of the corresponding botanical reference sample. Additional weak zones may be present. Under UV 254 nm the test solution shows three intense quenching zones at Rf ~ 0.05, 0.19 and 0.28. A characteristic quenching double zone is present at Rf ~ 0.40/0.38 (red arrows). At the position of gallic acid a quenching zone is visible. Under UV 366 nm there are blue fluorescent zones at Rf ~ 0.23 and Rf ~ 0.38 and a characteristic fluorescent zone at Rf ~ 0.53 (green arrow).

Test for other species: Under UV 254 nm there is no zone between Rf ~ 0.08 and 0.12 and no zone at Rf ~ 0.66 (Amla fruit, pink arrows). Under UV 366 nm no fluorescent zone is detectable at Rf ~ 0.52 (Belleric myrobalan fruit).

Source: HPTLC Association [4]

HPTLC-assoc-Logo-farbig-Text-schwarz-300x47.png
(thumbnail)
Triphala powder (mixture) HPTLC ID - UV 254 nm

Triphala powder (mixture of Phyllanthus emblica, Terminalia bellerica, Terminalia chebula)

Lane Assignments Lanes, from left to right (Track, Volume, Sample):

  1. 5 µL Chebulinic acid, ellagic acid, and gallic acid (increasing Rf)
  2. 1 µL Belleric myrobalan fruit
  3. 1 µL Chebulic myrobalan fruit
  4. 1 µL Amla fruit
  5. 1 µL Triphala powder 1
  6. 1 µL Triphala powder 2
  7. 1 µL Triphala powder 3
  8. 1 µL Triphala powder 4
  9. 1 µL Triphala tablets 1
  10. 1 µL Triphala tablets 2
  11. 1 µL Triphala tablets 3
  12. 1 µL Triphala tablets 4
  13. 1 µL Triphala tablets 5
  14. 2 µL Triphala powder extract
  15. 2 µL Triphala tablets 6 

Reference Sample(s) Reference: Dissolve 1 mg of chebulinic acid and 2 mg of gallic acid in 10 mL of methanol. Optional: dissolve 1 mg of ellagic acid in 10 mL of methanol. 

Stationary Phase Stationary phase, i.e. Silica gel 60, F254 

Mobile Phase Ethyl formate, toluene, formic acid, water 30:1.5:4:3 (v/v/v/v) 

Sample Preparation Method Sample: Mix 1.0 g of powdered sample with 10 mL of methanol and sonicate for 10 minutes, then centrifuge or filter and use the supernatants/filtrates as test solutions.

Derivatization reagent: 1.) NP reagent, Preparation: 1 g of NP reagent in 200 mL of ethyl acetate; 2.) PEG reagent, Preparation: 10 g of polyethylene glycol 400 in 200 mL of dichloromethane, Use: Heat plate 3min at 100°C, dip (time 0, speed 5) in NP reagent, dry and dip (time 0, speed 5) in PEG reagent. 

Detection Method Saturated chamber; developing distance 70 mm from lower edge; relative humidity 33% 

Other Notes Images presented in this entry are examples and are not intended to be used as basis for setting specifications for quality control purposes.

System suitability test: Chebulinic acid: a quenching zone at Rf ~ 0.26 (UV 245 nm). Gallic acid: a quenching zone at Rf ~ 0.71 (UV 245 nm).

Identification: Compare result with reference images. The fingerprint of the test solution is similar to that of the corresponding botanical reference sample. Additional weak zones may be present. Under UV 254 nm the test solution shows several diffuse quenching zones above the application position. The two main quenching zones are detected at Rf ~ 0.19 and Rf ~ 0.28 (red arrows). Above these zones there are additional diffuse quenching zones. There are quenching zones at the position of ellagic acid and of gallic acid. Under UV 366 nm two blue fluorescent zones are detected right above the application position (yellow arrow). Several intense blue fluorescent zones are present between Rf ~ 0.16 and 0.40. At the position of gallic acid there is a fluorescent zone.

Source: HPTLC Association [5]


Supplementary Information

Sources

  1. MOBOT, Tropicos.org http://www.tropicos.org/Image/100176418
  2. United States Dispensatory (1918)
  3. United States Dispensatory (1918)
  4. HPTLC Association http://www.hptlc-association.org/
  5. HPTLC Association http://www.hptlc-association.org/
Personal tools
MediaWiki Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux